After the 2008 market disaster, I resolved that I might be much more organized in my assessments and updating of fairness danger premiums, in the USA and overseas, as I seemed on the injury that may be inflicted on intrinsic worth by vital shifts in danger premiums, i.e., my definition of a disaster. That precipitated my observe of estimating implied fairness danger premiums for the S&P 500, in the beginning of each month, and following up of utilizing these estimated premiums when valuing firms throughout that month. The 2008 disaster additionally gave rise to 2 danger premium papers that I’ve up to date every year: the primary appears to be like at fairness danger premiums, what they measure, how they differ throughout time and the way greatest to estimate them, with the final replace in March 2024. The second focuses on nation danger and the way it varies throughout geographies, with the main target once more on determinants, measures and estimation, which I replace mid-year every year. This put up displays my most up-to-date replace from July 2024 of nation danger, and whilst you can learn the complete paper right here, I believed I might provide you with a mildly abridged model on this put up.
Nation Threat: Determinants
  On the danger of stating the plain, investing and working in some international locations is far riskier than investing and working in others, with variations in danger on  a number of dimensions. Within the part beneath, I spotlight the variations on 4 main dimensions – political construction, publicity to conflict/violence, extent of corruption and protections for authorized and property rights, with the main target firmly on the financial dangers slightly than on social penalties.
a. Political Construction
   Would you slightly make investments/function in a democracy than in an autocracy? From a enterprise danger perspective, I might argue that there’s a commerce off, generally making the previous extra dangerous than the latter, and generally much less so. The character of a democracy is {that a} authorities will likely be much less in a position to promise or ship long run predictable/secure tax and regulatory legislation, since shedding an election may cause shifts in coverage. Consequently, working and investing in a democratic nation will typically include extra danger on a steady foundation, with the danger rising with partisanship within the nation. Autocratic governments are in a greater place to vow and ship secure and predictable enterprise environments, with two caveats. The primary is that when change is available in autocracies, it is going to be each sudden and huge, with wrenching and discontinuous shifts in financial coverage. The second is that the absence of checks and steadiness (authorized, legislative, public opinion) may even imply that coverage modifications will be capricious, usually pushed by components which have little to do with enterprise or public welfare.Â
  Any try and measure political freedom comes with qualifiers, because the biases of the measuring service on what freedoms to raise and which of them to disregard will play a task, however within the determine beneath, I report the Economist’s Democracy Index, which relies upon 5 measures – electoral course of and pluralism, authorities functioning, political participation, democratic social tradition and civil liberties:
Primarily based upon the Economist’s democracy measures, a lot of the world stays skewed in direction of authoritarianism, altering the danger exposures that traders and companies face when working in these elements of the world.Â
b. Battle and Violence
  Working a enterprise turns into way more troublesome, when surrounded by conflict and violence, from each inside and outdoors the nation. That problem additionally interprets into increased prices, with these companies that may purchase safety or insurance coverage doing so, and those who can not affected by injury and misplaced revenues. Drawing once more on an exterior service, the Institute for Economics and Peace measures publicity to conflict and violence with a worldwide peace index (with increased scores indicating extra propensity in direction of violence):
Whereas Africa and huge swaths of Asia are uncovered to violence, and Northern Europe and Canada stay peaceable, companies in a lot of the world (together with the USA) stay uncovered to violence, no less than based on this measure.
c. Corruption
Once more, whilst you can argue with the scores and the rankings, it stays simple that companies in a lot of the world face corruption (and its related prices). Whereas there are some who attribute it to tradition, I imagine that the overriding causes for corruption are programs which can be constructed round licensing and regulatory constraints, with poorly paid bureaucrats working because the overseersÂ
d. Authorized and Property Rights
  When working a enterprise or investing, you might be reliant on a authorized system to again up your possession rights, and to the extent that it doesn’t achieve this, your small business and funding will likely be value much less. The Property Rights Alliance, an entity that makes an attempt to measure the energy of property rights, by nation, measured property rights (bodily and mental) all over the world, to give you a composite measure of those rights, with increased values translating into extra rights. Their most up-to-date replace, from 2023, is captured within the image beneath:
Once more, there are large variations in property rights the world over; they’re strongest within the North America and Europe and weakest in Africa and Latin America. Inside every of those areas, although, there are variations throughout international locations; inside Latin America, Chile and Uruguay rank within the high quartile of nations with stronger property rights, however Venezuela and Bolivia are in direction of the underside of the checklist. In assessing protections of property rights, it’s value noting that it’s not solely the legal guidelines that shield them that have to be checked out, but in addition the timeliness of authorized motion. A courtroom that takes a long time to behave on violations of property rights is nearly as unhealthy as a courtroom that doesn’t implement these rights in any respect.
  One manifestation of property proper violation is nationalization, and right here once more there stay elements of the world, particularly with pure useful resource companies, the place the dangers of expropriation have elevated. A Sustainalytics report that checked out steel miners documented 165 incidents of sources nationalization between 2017 and 2021, impacting 87 mining firms, with 22 excessive instances, the place native governments ending contracts with overseas miners. Maplecroft, a danger administration firm, mapped out the trendline on nationalization danger in pure sources within the determine beneath:
Nationwide safety is the explanation that some governments use to justify public possession of key sources. As an illustration, in 2022, Mexico created a state-owned firm, Litio Para Mexico, to have a monopoly on lithium mining within the nation, and introduced a plan to renegotiate beforehand granted concessions to non-public firms to extract the useful resource.
Nation Threat: Exterior components
  Wanting on the final part, you wouldn’t be faulted for believing that nation danger publicity is self-determined, and that international locations can grow to be much less dangerous by engaged on lowering corruption, rising  authorized protections for property rights, making themselves safer and dealing on extra predictable financial insurance policies.  That’s true, however there are three components which can be largely out of their management that may nonetheless drive nation danger upwards.
1. Commodity Dependence
   Some international locations are dependent upon a particular commodity, services or products for his or her financial success. That dependence can create extra danger for traders and companies, since a drop within the commodity’s worth or demand for the product/service can create extreme financial ache that spreads effectively past the businesses instantly affected. Thus, if a rustic derives 50% of its financial output from iron ore, a drop within the worth of iron ore will trigger ache not just for mining firms but in addition for retailers, eating places and client product firms within the nation. The United Nations Convention on Commerce and Improvement (UNCTAD) measures the diploma to which a rustic relies on commodities, by trying on the share of its export revenues come from a commodities, and the determine beneath captures their findings:
Why don’t international locations that derive a disproportionate quantity of their economic system from a single supply diversify their economies? That’s simpler mentioned than finished, for 2 causes. First, whereas it’s possible for bigger international locations like Brazil, India, and China to attempt to broaden their financial bases, it’s way more troublesome for small international locations like Peru or Angola to do the identical. Like small firms, these small international locations should discover a area of interest the place they’ll specialize, and by definition, niches will result in over dependence upon one or just a few sources. Second, and that is particularly the case with pure useful resource dependent international locations, the wealth that may be created by exploiting the pure useful resource will normally be far larger than utilizing sources elsewhere within the economic system, which can clarify the shortcoming of economies within the Center East to wean itself away from oil.Â
II. Life Cycle dynamics
  As readers of this weblog must be conscious, I’m keen on utilizing the company life cycle construction to elucidate why firms behave (or misbehave) and the way funding philosophies differ. On the danger of pushing that construction to its limits, I imagine that international locations additionally undergo a life cycle, with totally different challenges and dangers at every stage:
The hyperlink between life cycle and financial danger is value emphasizing as a result of it illustrates the restrictions on the powers that international locations have over their publicity to danger. A rustic that’s nonetheless within the early levels of financial development will typically have extra danger publicity than a mature nation, even whether it is effectively ruled and has a strong authorized system. The outdated funding saying that acquire normally comes with ache, additionally applies to working and investing throughout the globe. Whereas your danger averse aspect might lead you to direct your investments and operations to the most secure elements of the world (say, Canada and Northern Europe), the very best development is usually within the riskiest elements of the world.
3. Local weather Change
   The globe is warming up, and regardless of the place you fall on the human versus nature debate, on causation, some international locations are extra uncovered to international warming than others. That danger is not only to the well being and wellbeing of those that stay inside the borders of those international locations, however represents financial dangers, manifesting as increased prices of sustaining day-to-day exercise or much less financial manufacturing.  To measure local weather change, we turned to ResourceWatch, a worldwide partnership of public, non-public and civil society organizations convened by the World Sources Institute. This institute measure local weather change publicity with a local weather danger index (CRI), measuring the extent to which international locations have been affected by excessive climate occasions (meteorological, hydrological, and climatological), and their most up-to-date measures (from 2021, with an replace anticipated late in 2024) of world publicity to local weather danger is within the determine beneath:
Be aware that increased scores on the index point out extra publicity to nation danger, and far of Africa, Latin America and Asia are uncovered. In truth, since this map was final up to date in 2021, it’s conceivable that local weather danger publicity has elevated throughout the globe and that even the inexperienced areas are liable to slipping away into harmful territory.
Nation Life Cycle – Measures
  With that lengthy lead in on the determinants of nation danger, and the forces that may depart danger elevated, allow us to take a look at how greatest to measure nation danger publicity. We’ll begin with sovereign scores, that are targeted on nation default danger, as a result of they’re essentially the most extensively used nation danger proxies, earlier than shifting on to nation danger scores, from private and non-private companies, and shutting with measures of danger premiums that fairness traders in these international locations ought to cost.
1. Sovereign Default Threat
  The scores businesses that fee company bonds for default danger additionally fee international locations, with sovereign scores, with international locations with increased (decrease) perceived default danger receiving decrease (increased) scores. I do know that scores businesses are considered with skepticism, and far of that skepticism is deserved, however it’s simple that scores and default danger are intently tied, particularly over longer durations. The determine beneath summarizes sovereign scores from Moody’s in July 2024:
![]() |
Moody’s Sovereign Rankings in July 2023; Supply: Moody’s |
If you happen to examine these scores to people who I reported in my final replace, a yr in the past, you’ll discover that the scores are stagnant for many international locations, and when there may be change, it’s small. That is still my pet peeve with the score businesses, which isn’t that they’re biased and even incorrect, however that they’re sluggish to react to modifications on the bottom. For these trying to find another, there may be the sovereign credit score default swap (CDS) market, the place you possibly can market assessments of default danger. The determine beneath summarizes the spreads for the roughly 80 international locations, the place they’re obtainable:
![]() |
Sovereign CDS Spreads on June 30, 2024: Supply: Bloomberg |
Sovereign CDS spreads replicate the pluses and minuses of a market-based measure, adjusting shortly to modifications on the bottom in a rustic, however generally overshooting as markets overreact. As you possibly can see, the sovereign CDS market views India as safer than instructed by the scores businesses, and for the primary time, in my monitoring, as safer than China (Sovereign CDS for India is 0.83% and for China is 1.05%, as of June 30, 2024).
2. Nation Threat Scores
  Ubiquitous as sovereign scores are, they characterize a slender measure of nation danger, targeted completely on default danger. Thus, a lot of the Center East appears to be like protected, from a default danger perspective, however there are clearly political and financial dangers that aren’t being captured. One antidote is to make use of a danger rating that brings in these missed dangers, and whereas there are various companies that present these scores, I exploit those provided by Political Threat Companies (PRS). PRS makes use of twenty two variables to measure nation danger, whey then seize with a rustic danger rating, from 0 to 100, with the riskiest international locations having the bottom scores and the most secure international locations, the very best:
Whereas I respect the trouble that goes into these scores, I’ve points with a few of the scoring, as I’m certain that you simply do. As an illustration, I discover it incomprehensible that Libya and the USA share roughly the identical PRS rating, and that Saudi Arabia is safer than a lot of Europe. That mentioned, I’ve tried different nation danger scoring companies (the Economist, The World Financial institution) and I discover myself disagreeing with particular person nation scoring there as effectively.
3. Fairness Threat Premiums
  operations and investing, via the eyes of fairness traders, the danger that you simply care about is the fairness danger premium, a composite measure that you simply then incorporate into anticipated returns. I do not declare to have prescience and even the most effective method for estimating these fairness danger premiums, however I’ve constantly adopted the identical method for the final three a long time. I begin with the sovereign scores, if obtainable, and estimate default spreads primarily based upon these scores, and I then scale up these scores for the truth that equities are riskier than authorities bonds. I then add these nation danger premiums to my estimate of the implied fairness danger premium for the S&P 500, to reach at fairness danger premiums, by nation.Â
For international locations which don’t have any sovereign scores, I begin with the nation danger rating from PRS for that nation, discover different (rated) international locations with comparable PRS scores, and extrapolate their ratings-based fairness danger premiums. The ultimate image, no less than as I see it in 2024, for fairness danger premiums is beneath:
You’ll undoubtedly disagree with the fairness danger premiums that I connect to no less than a few of the international locations on this checklist, and maybe strongly disagree with my estimate on your native nation, however it’s best to maybe take difficulty with Moody’s or PRS, if that is the case.
Nation Threat in Determination Making
  At this level, your response to this dialogue is perhaps “so what?”, since you may even see little use for these ideas in observe, both as a enterprise or as an investor. On this part, I’ll argue that understanding fairness danger premiums, and the way they differ throughout geographies, will be vital in each enterprise and private investing.
Nation Threat in Enterprise
  Most company finance courses and textbooks depart college students with the proposition that the correct hurdle fee to make use of in assessing enterprise investments is the price of capital, however create a number of confusion about what precisely that value of capital measures. Opposite to well-liked knowledge, the price of capital to make use of when assessing funding high quality has little to do with the price of elevating financing for an organization and extra to do with arising with a chance value, i.e., a fee of return that the corporate can generate on investments of equal danger. Thus outlined, you possibly can see that the price of capital that an organization makes use of for an funding ought to replicate each the enterprise danger in addition to the place on the earth that funding is situated. For a multinational client product firm, comparable to Coca Cola, the price of capital used to evaluate the standard of a Brazilian beverage mission must be very totally different from the price of capital estimated for a German beverage mission, even when each are estimated in US {dollars}. The image beneath captures the components that go right into a hurdle fee:
Thus, in computing prices of fairness and capital for its Brazil and German initiatives, Coca Cola will likely be drawing on the fairness danger premiums for Brazil (7.87%) and Germany (4.11%), resulting in increased hurdle charges for the previous.
  The implications for multi-business, multi-national firms is that there isn’t a one company value of capital that can be utilized in assessing investments, since it’s going to differ each throughout companies and throughout geographies. An organization in 5 companies and ten geographies, with have fifty totally different prices of capital, and whilst you grievance might that that is too sophisticated, ignoring it and utilizing one company value of capital will lead you to cross subsidization, with the most secure companies and geographies subsidizing the riskiest.
Nation Threat in Investing
  As traders, we put money into firms, not initiatives, with these firms usually having exposures in lots of international locations. Whereas it’s attainable to worth an organization in items, by valuing every its operations in every nation, the absence of knowledge on the nation stage usually leads us to valuing the complete firm, and when doing so, the danger publicity for that firm comes from the place it operates, not the place it does enterprise. Thus, when computing its value of fairness, it’s best to look not solely at its businesss danger, however what elements of the world it operates in:
In intrinsic valuation, this can indicate that an organization with extra of its operations in dangerous international locations will likely be value lower than an organization with equal earnings, development and money flows with operations in safer international locations. Thus, slightly than take a look at the place an organization is included and traded, we must be the place it operates, each when it comes to manufacturing and revenues; Nvidia is an organization included and traded in the USA, however as a chip designed virtually completely depending on TSMC for its chip manufacture, it’s uncovered to China danger.
  It’s true that the majority traders worth firms, slightly than worth them, and use pricing metrics (PE ratios, EV to EBITDA) to guage low-cost or costly. If our evaluation of nation danger maintain, we should always anticipate to see variations in these pricing metrics throughout geographies. We computed EV to EBITDA multiples, primarily based upon mixture enterprise worth and EBITDA, by nation, in July 2024, and the outcomes are captured within the determine beneath:
![]() |
Supply: Uncooked information from S&P Capital IQ |
The outcomes are combined. Whereas a few of the riskiest elements of the world commerce at low multiples of EBITDA, a big a part of Europe additionally does, together with France and Norway. In truth, India trades on the highest a number of of EBITDA of any nation on the earth, representing how development expectations can trump danger issues.Â
Foreign money Results
  You might discover it odd that I’ve spent a lot of this put up speaking about nation danger, with out mentioning currencies, however that was not an oversight. It’s true that riskier international locations usually have extra risky currencies that depreciate over time, however this extra a symptom of nation danger, than a trigger. As I’ll argue on this part, forex alternative impacts your development, money stream and low cost fee estimates, however in the end shouldn’t have any impact on intrinsic worth.  Â
  If you happen to worth an organization in US {dollars}, slightly than Indian rupees, ought to the numbers in your valuation be totally different? In fact, however the motive for the variations lies in the truth that totally different currencies convey totally different inflation expectations with them, and the hot button is to remain constant:
If anticipated inflation is decrease in US {dollars} than in rupees, the price of capital that it’s best to get hold of for an organization in US {dollars} will likely be decrease than the price of capital in rupees, with the distinction reflecting the anticipated inflation differential. Nevertheless, since your money flows may even then should be in US {dollars}, the anticipated development that it’s best to use ought to replicate the decrease inflation fee in {dollars}, and when you keep constant in your inflation estimates, the consequences ought to cancel out. This isn’t simply concept, however frequent sense. Foreign money is a measurement mechanism, and to say that an organization is undervalued in a single forex (say, the rupee) whereas claiming that it’s overvalued on the similar time in one other forex (say, the US greenback) is unnecessary. To practitioners who will counter with examples, the place the worth is totally different, while you swap currencies, my response is that there’s a forex view (that the rupee is beneath or overestimated relative to the greenback) in your valuation in your valuation, and that view shouldn’t be bundled collectively along with your firm story in a valuation.
  As we famous within the final part, the place that forex enters your valuation is within the riskfree fee, and if my assertion about anticipated inflation is true, variations in riskfree charges will be attributed completely to distinction in anticipated inflation. In the beginning of July 2024, as an illustration, I estimated the riskfree charges in each forex, utilizing the US treasury bond fee as my greenback riskfree fee, and the differential inflation between the forex in query and the US greenback:
My estimates are within the appendix to this put up. In the identical vein, inflation additionally enters into anticipated change fee calculations:
That is, in fact, the buying energy parity theorem, and whereas currencies can deviate from this within the quick time period, it stays one of the simplest ways to make sure that your forex views don’t hijack your valuation.
YouTube Video
My Nation danger premium paper
My Information Hyperlinks