CRA loss in ex-Jays’ tax case a win for Canadian sports activities followers

Article content material

The names Russell Martin and Josh Donaldson invoke recollections of some implausible seasons for a lot of Toronto Blue Jays followers. For tax professionals, they’re now additionally necessary gamers in an important courtroom judgment launched this month.

Article content material

Article content material

The ruling by the Tax Courtroom of Canada entails a type of pension plan known as a Retirement Compensation Association (RCA). These preparations are generally utilized by these quickly working in Canada, who might not be eligible for different retirement plans or who could also be topic to contribution restrictions on different Canadian plans. Whereas an RCA can apply to many sorts of staff, it’s generally used for athletes who’re non-residents of Canada enjoying for Canadian groups, typically for a short while.

Article content material

A 3rd-party actuary determines the utmost quantity the worker can contribute to such a plan. Normally, the contributions are topic to a better most quantity than, say, an RRSP, however would then scale back the wage distributed to the worker. So, if an worker’s wage is $200,000 and $10,000 is hypothetically contributed to the RCA, they’d solely obtain $190,000. The $10,000 can be topic to an instantaneous 50 per cent refundable tax from the Canadian Income Company (CRA), and the remaining $5,000 is put right into a belief that another person holds and invests. Any revenue earned from the investments can be topic to this 50 per cent tax.

When there’s a distribution from the plan, presumably when the worker has retired and is in a decrease tax bracket, the worker receives again the 50 per cent refundable tax that was remitted to the CRA, after which pays a flat tax of 25 per cent in Canada on the entire distribution if they’re a non-resident of Canada.

That is the place the tax courtroom case involving the 2 former Blue Jay gamers turns into necessary.

A non-resident athlete enjoying for a Canadian crew is taxed on a proportion of their earnings decided by the times they bodily play in Canada. With hockey, for instance, that might imply the times they’re bodily in Canada enjoying for his or her residence crew and towards different Canadian groups. For baseball, since there is just one Canadian crew, the tax is simply utilized to the times the gamers are in Canada. The CRA agreed with the gamers that 40 per cent of the time, they had been bodily in Canada, incomes Canadian supply revenue, and 60 per cent of the time, they weren’t in Canada, incomes international supply revenue. As non-residents of Canada for tax functions, they’d pay Canadian tax on the 40 per cent, once more a share agreed to by the CRA. The years in query had been 2015, 2016 and 2017 for Martin and 2016 and 2017 for Donaldson. Because the similar subject was concerned, the circumstances had been heard and determined collectively.

Article content material

Article content material

In 2017, to make use of one of many frequent years, Martin’s complete wage was US$20,000,000 and Donaldson’s was US$17,000,000, and US$2,451,597 and US$1,815,768 had been positioned of their respective RCAs.

In Martin’s case, the CRA took the US$20,000,000 much less the US$2,451,597 RCA deduction, after which cut up the taxable the rest of US$17,548,403 between the agreed-upon resident and non-resident days. In different phrases, he was anticipated to pay tax on $17,548,403 x 40 per cent, or $7,019,361. The identical formulation utilized to Donaldson. 

The gamers’ legal professionals, nevertheless, argued that the 40/60 cut up must be utilized first, and the quantity going to the RCA ought to scale back the Canadian portion of revenue to be taxed. Martin would thus take the 40 per cent of US$20,000,000 attributable to his days in Canada, or US$8,000,000, after which scale back it by the RCA contribution of US$2,451,597, making his taxable revenue for the 12 months US$5,548,403.

The gamers’ strategy results in a major distinction within the deferred revenue to be taxed, though the pay and contribution to the RCA are the identical in each examples. Within the case of the gamers, the distinction in tax payments can be effectively into the a whole lot of hundreds of {dollars} annually.

Article content material

In a 60-page ruling, the courtroom stated the case hinged on how we learn the tax legislation. All of the details had been agreed upon, and nobody testified on the listening to. In the end, the courtroom sided with the gamers, figuring out that the RCA deduction is within the tax code and is a Canadian cost that must be a deduction to revenue from Canadian sources, not the general wage.

The ruling has solidified the interpretation many tax professionals beforehand held about how these plans ought to work. It’s going to additionally assist to keep away from discouraging athletes from eager to play in Canada.

Article content material