The election’s over. The Republicans ran the desk. Now, brokers who had been making ready to satisfy with purchasers to debate the “either-or” strategy to sundown planning described in “Serving to Shoppers Plan Their Life Insurance coverage Technique for Attainable Sundown” are focusing completely on the no-sunset aspect of the equation. The truth is, I wouldn’t be shocked if the notion of outright repeal of the property tax is now discovering its approach into the dialog.
A Extra Consultative Dialog
There’s no extra attention-grabbing side of the no-sunset planning dialogue than the potential use of a life settlement. Nevertheless, to make sure that the transaction is accorded correct consideration in that dialogue, brokers and the life settlement corporations they name on for help could should revise their typical strategy to presenting the transaction in favor of a extra consultative one. It’s a little bit of a paradigm shift, largely as a result of it’s not the standard train in promoting the transaction to a policyholder who may actually use the cash. That is an train in consulting on the transaction to a consumer who doesn’t want the cash and may’t get at it anyway as a result of the coverage is owned by an irrevocable life insurance coverage belief (ILIT). This dialog requires a a lot totally different tenor, texture and tempo than the standard life settlement presentation.
The Setting and the Gamers
A rich consumer bought a big coverage just a few years in the past to offer property tax liquidity. The coverage is held in an ILIT, supported by both money presents or a split-dollar plan. Whereas the election presumably eradicated the property tax liquidity want, the consumer and their planning crew are about to begin contemplating whether or not the ILIT ought to maintain the coverage, although maybe with a tweak or two, redeploy it for different wants or strategic functions, alternate it for a brand new coverage or promote it to realize nonetheless different aims, like repaying the consumer’s split-dollar loans to the ILIT or simply getting a greater return on the cash invested within the coverage.
Because the orchestrator of the a number of discussions it can take for the consumer and crew to reach at a conclusion, the agent faces a multi-faceted problem. They’ve to explain a decidedly technical, nuanced and arcane set of information, planning points and potential responses to a gaggle of advisors comprised of attorneys, tax advisors, funding advisors and, in fact, ILIT trustees, all with various ranges of understanding of, {and professional} curiosity in, what’s concerned right here. So, the agent and the life settlement firm (the corporate) consultant becoming a member of the agent on the decision should be ready to satisfy the consumer and crew the place they discover them to deliver them up the training curve with simply sufficient tempo to keep away from making a paralysis by evaluation. Simple, proper?
Right here’s a suggestion. In “The No-Sundown Life Insurance coverage Paradigm Shift Might Now Be Underway,” I really helpful that brokers check with the superior planning attorneys who will help them in these discussions. Right here once more, I like to recommend that the agent check with and “prep” the consultant in order that, as a crew, they’re in sync as to the place to go within the dialog, the place to not go and, critically, the place every of the advisors will probably be coming from once they ask their questions.
Presentation Highlights
We’ll assume that the agent has reviewed the case with the corporate in order that when the group will get to the agenda merchandise “Life Settlement,” the agent can briefly introduce the corporate and the consultant and their credentials after which get right down to enterprise. Right here’s what the agent, with well timed assist from the consultant, plans to cowl:
- At a excessive stage, whether or not the coverage is marketable. Can they even go down that street?
- Ballpark solely: how a lot can the ILIT get for the coverage
- The tax implications of the sale. Bear in mind, the ILIT is probably going a grantor belief, which implies that the ILIT will maintain the complete proceeds of the sale however ship the tax invoice to the consumer, which will certainly influence the deliberations.
- What the agent would require to get a extra definitive studying, that’s, the method, who does what and the way lengthy it takes.
- Recognizing that, in lots of conditions, the dialogue will probably boil right down to a call to promote the coverage and reinvest the proceeds or maintain it on the lowest supporting premium to life expectancy, how the agent and the corporate may help the consumer and crew make an knowledgeable determination. As a result of the consumer’s funding advisor and the ILIT’s trustee will take heart stage on this side of the dialogue, the agent ought to ensure the consultant has seen my articles “Life Settlements – Planning Concerns Past the Supply “and “How Trustees Ought to Incorporate Life Settlements in ILIT Assessments.”
That’s it. Something extra at this juncture will probably be “TMI.” Something much less will rob the dialogue of wanted momentum. This isn’t a simple steadiness for the agent and the consultant to strike. However as soon as they get via their first presentation, they’ll refine it and have their template for discussions with different purchasers.
I can’t overstate the worth of the contribution that the agent and the corporate could make to the dialogue in the event that they do it proper. And I’d be very shocked if that contribution doesn’t lead to some referrals from these advisors.
