1. Harmonization of Pre-packs
The European Union seeks to harmonize European Insolvency Regulation. It has proposed a Directive for the harmonisation of sure points of insolvency regulation throughout Member States, together with pre-packs.[1] The Fee’s ambition is to have this Proposal for a European pre-pack adopted as a Directive already by January 2026 (“the Proposal”).[2]
A pre-pack is a ready insolvency process through which the sale of the enterprise to a brand new proprietor is organized previous to the opening of insolvency proceedings. Usually, this sale course of takes place in a closed bidding atmosphere and even in secrecy, so as to not disrupt the enterprise and to make sure worth maximization for collectors. As soon as the corporate is asserted bancrupt, the very first thing that may usually occur is that the courtroom appointed trustee will switch the enterprise to the best bidder popping out of the sale course of.[3]
Pre-packs have a tainted repute, no less than in jurisdictions the place they’re getting used.[4] Partially that is as a result of extremely authorized nature of a pre-pack which overrides what folks see on the street. In case of a prepack, an organization as authorized entity is asserted bancrupt by the courtroom, however the enterprise uninterruptedly continues to function with a brand new proprietor. Collectors can now not pursue their declare in opposition to the enterprise (which is transferred to the brand new proprietor) and should file their declare with the trustee of the bankrupt entity. So long as pre-packs are carried out with outdoors events, there’s nevertheless little room for abuse. The process would then merely search to make sure that the enterprise is bought to the best bidder within the curiosity of the joint collectors.[5] The prevention of harm attributable to disruption by guaranteeing a confidential preparation solely maximizes worth. If that is what the pre-pack is all about, there’s little trigger for the contaminated repute.
Nonetheless, in case a pre-pack is carried out with the previous homeowners, shareholders and/or administrators (“associated celebration/events”) pre-packs are very a lot liable to abuse and opportunistic behaviour. In such a associated celebration transaction, usually such celebration will arrange a brand new firm and purchase all of the property out of the insolvency process. In such instances, not solely the enterprise will proceed working, but in addition the final word helpful proprietor would be the identical previous to and after conducting a pre-pack. Such a process will in the long run not primarily be aimed on the curiosity of the joint collectors, [6] however will slightly be aimed toward guaranteeing that the associated celebration can proceed working the enterprise whereas eliminating extra debt and/or personnel. Associated celebration acquisitions may be fastidiously deliberate and organized with authorized recommendation to make sure that the associated celebration will truly be the buying celebration. If pre-packs may also be carried out with associated events, the contaminated repute is absolutely comprehensible. The confidential pre-pack section in actual fact solely ensures the avoidance of competitors of third events. Many Member States fairly understandably have guidelines in opposition to pre-packs with associated events.
The European Union now needs to harmonize insolvency regulation in numerous fields and has additionally included pre-packs within the Proposal. The EU needs to pressure all Member States to permit for pre-packs additionally with associated events, thereby opening the door for various methods of abuse and opportunism.
We’ll first focus on how a pre-pack process can be utilized by associated events to additional their very own pursuits slightly than these of collectors (§2). Subsequently, we’ll focus on totally different measures taken by Member States to limit pre-packs with associated events (§ 3). We’ll then focus on the Proposal and the illogical and shocking option to pressure all Member States to permit for pre-packs with associated events. We will even make strategies for mandatory but easy and efficient adjustments to the Proposal (§ 4 and § 5).
2. Pre-packs with associated events; not for collectors, however for associated events
Advocates of the pre-pack current it as a instrument to guard collectors. The pre-pack would search to make sure that the enterprise is bought to the best bidder with out disruption and lack of worth.[7] Nonetheless, in case associated events purchase the enterprise, this logic creates no less than three issues.
The primary drawback is said to the character of pre-packs, specifically the closed bidding atmosphere. In an effort to hold suppliers supplying, prospects shopping for and staff working, it deserves to have a closed bidding process. This, nevertheless, has the chance of not reaching all potential patrons. A public chapter sale usually seeks to succeed in as many patrons as potential, however this has the unfavourable results of disruption of the enterprise.
The second drawback arises if associated events (such because the earlier proprietor) are additionally fascinated about buying the enterprise. Associated events have the insurmountable benefit of inside data: they know the enterprise, the shoppers and the dangers and are thus capable of make the very best supply within the quick interval of accessible time, however are additionally capable of limit this supply to the naked minimal. This was evidenced by the pre-pack that gave rise to the Estro-case.[8]
The third and most tough drawback is that, in case of pre-packs with associated events, such acquisitions may be fastidiously deliberate and organized with authorized recommendation to make sure that the shareholder would be the buying celebration. One common approach to take action, is to take out key property, reminiscent of IP rights or actual property. That is known as asset partitioning. Asset partitioning will not be essentially aimed toward creating a greater place in case of insolvency. It may also be the results of cautious fiscal or property planning. Regardless of the motive has been for asset partitioning, the consequence shall be that it’s harder and even not possible to switch a enterprise stand alone, as a result of these important contracts are managed by associated events. By and huge, the Member States of the European Union haven’t but come to phrases with these practices.[9]
3. The present, sceptical European panorama as to associated celebration pre-packs
The pre-pack will not be but a phenomenon that’s facilitated by all Member States.[10] Already subsequently, one would count on the European Union, if it calls for Member States to implement a brand new process, to not pressure implementation of essentially the most contentious model thereof as a pre-pack with associated events. Completely different Member States which might be experimenting with pre-packs, have totally different guidelines on pre-packs or different types of acquisition out of insolvency by associated events.[11] These totally different guidelines reveal totally different methods, starting from full out bans, to elevated collectors participation and the involvement of out of doors consultants.
French regulation merely bans acquisition by associated events. French regulation supplies for a prohibition in artwork. 642-3 Code du Commerce. Artwork. 642 issues the sale of a enterprise out of a ‘concilation’ process, which may be certified as a continuation of the enterprise out of insolvency. Artwork. 642-3 Code du Commerce prohibits direct or oblique acquisition by each administrators and shareholders for a interval as much as 5 years after the transaction.[12]
Spain supplies for a de facto ban on associated celebration acquisitions in case of pre-packs. In case of a associated celebration acquisition, money owed switch together with the enterprise.[13] The rule already applies to shareholders holding 10% or extra of the shares.[14]
Germany supplies for a process referred to a restructuring switch (übertragende Sanierung). In deciding on the acquiror, the courtroom appointed trustee, should have in mind the pursuits of the collectors. Artwork.162 InsO places further hurdles in case a associated celebration as offered in artwork. 138 InsO needs to amass the enterprise, by offering that in such a case the assembly of collectors has to consent.[15]
Polish regulation does permit for a pre-pack[16] and likewise for pre-packs with associated events. In case of pre-packs with associated events, the regulation introduces further necessities and collectors can object. If the acquiror is a associated celebration, the courtroom will appoint an skilled to conduct an impartial valuation. Polish regulation supplies in artwork. 56b of the Polish Insolvency Act that the decide will solely sanction a pre-pack if the worth won’t fall under the impartial valuation.[17]
The Belgian legislator has acknowledged the chance of aggressive asset partitioning which might give the associated celebration acquiror an unjust benefit. Belgian regulation supplies {that a} shareholder might solely make a bid if it additionally makes out there on the market any property it controls, in order that an outsider can purchase the whole enterprise.[18] The same provision may be discovered within the legal guidelines of Luxemburg in artwork. 58/2 of the related Act.[19]
International locations with out limitations on associated celebration pre-packs, shortly derail and see the pre-pack develop right into a instrument the place in a really important half[20] and even the vast majority of instances the shareholders or different associated events are those to amass the enterprise out of insolvency.[21] In legislating the problem, one ought to subsequently understand that as quickly as one opens the door for associated celebration pre-packs, these are more likely to type the vast majority of instances because of the issues of abuse of confidentiality, data asymmetry and asset partitioning.
4. EU Proposal for associated celebration pre-packs
The EU has chosen the subject of pre-packs as a subject for harmonization. We’re sympathetic in direction of permitting for non-related celebration pre-packs. We do have critical issues as to associated celebration acquisitions.
The final guidelines may be present in article 22 Proposal offering for the appointment of a monitor and article 22a (Rules of the preparation section), which supplies that Member States shall make sure that the sale course of is aggressive, clear, honest, and meets market requirements.[22]
4.1 Proposed pre-pack with associated events: unhealthy for collectors
The important thing provision coping with associated celebration transaction is to be present in artwork. 32 Proposal. Artwork. 32 does two issues. The primary and most necessary aspect is that artwork. 32 Proposal forces Member States to permit for associated celebration acquisitions. The second aspect is that it tries to put some safeguards, some necessary and a few elective. The Proposal reads as follows:
Article 32: Events intently associated to the debtor within the sale course of:
1. Member States shall make sure that events intently associated to the debtor are eligible to amass the debtor’s enterprise or half thereof, offered that all the following situations are met:
(a) the events intently associated to the debtor disclose within the bid to the monitor their relation to the debtor;
(b) different events than these referred in level (a) to the sale course of obtain satisfactory data on the existence of events intently associated to the debtor and their relation to the latter;
(ba) within the case underneath article 26(1), level (a), a valuation of the enterprise as a going concern is carried out for the needs of the assertion of the monitor referred to in Article 22a(2), level (c).
(d) events not intently associated to the debtor are granted enough time to make a proposal.
Member States might present that, the place it’s confirmed {that a} celebration intently associated to the debtor didn’t adjust to the situations underneath the primary subparagraph, level (a), the courtroom or competent authority revokes the advantages referred to in Article 28(1).
2. The place the supply made by a celebration intently associated to the debtor is taken into account as the very best supply, Member States might introduce further safeguards for the authorisation and execution of the sale of the debtor’s enterprise or half thereof.
This text foremost forces Member States to permit for associated celebration pre-packs. In case of associated celebration pre-packs the Proposal requires an satisfactory valuation. The Proposal then opens the chance that further safeguards are launched together with a revocation of the lack of money owed and liabilities, which means that liabilities do switch. There are additionally further safeguards recommended.[23] In response to Preamble 26 the method ought to embrace an invite to doubtlessly events disclosing ’the identical data’ to potential patrons. And eventually, Preamble 28d calls for that ‘the eligibility of intently associated events to bid ought to, however, be balanced with enhanced scrutiny of the bidding course of’.[24]
All of the recommended safeguards in the long run won’t actually create a stage enjoying area for associated events and exterior events. These measures can not adequately take away the knowledge benefit construct up over years and may also not treatment that many companies can not simply be bought stand alone. In fact, the courtroom may theoretically merely deny sanctioning a pre-pack in case the courtroom believes an undue benefit for a associated celebration stays.[25] Right here, nevertheless, the decide is put able that he has to decide on the lesser of two evils: i) sanctioning a doubtful pre-pack or ii) being strict and thereby denying the sanctioning of the pre-pack which is able to most certainly make the collectors worse off in contrast with the doubtful pre-pack. We quote right here a Dutch Supervisory Choose’s imaginative and prescient on these theoretical prospects contained in a earlier Dutch invoice on pre-packs:
“Though it’s theoretically right that the unusual collectors may, as said within the explanatory memorandum, request the courtroom to not sanction the pre-pack, this theoretical chance has no sensible relevance. The aim of the pre-pack is to facilitate a continuation of the enterprise as shortly as potential and the pre-pack shall be sanctioned on the day of the opening of the insolvency process. At the moment, there’s not even but a proper public proclamation of the opening of the insolvency process and collectors haven’t been notified. The request filed by collectors on the premise of article 69 Chapter Act, will merely be too little too late (like mustard after the meal). It very a lot stays to be seen whether or not any potential profit to be gained by the unusual collectors (by contesting the pre-pack, added authors) will outweigh the lack of their place in case of a pre-pack in case the corporate enters a standard liquidation process.”[26]
Associated celebration acquisitions are and can stay very a lot liable to abusive practices. One of the best ways to forestall this, is to easily ban associated celebration acquisitions.[27] Within the Proposal we don’t see satisfactory checks in opposition to aggressive asset partitioning nor enough safeguards that the previous shareholder really is prepared to let go of the enterprise.[28] The safeguards which might be recommended aren’t necessary and don’t actually resolve the three issues that we’ve recognized. In case of secured shareholder loans, the Proposal additionally appears to need to permit for credit score bids.[29]
We see many objections in opposition to pre-packs with associated events. However, we see no compelling case for unrestricted associated celebration pre-pack acquisitions, nor are any clear causes supplied within the Proposal.[30] The Proposal doesn’t clarify through which instances it will even be possible that it’s truly the shareholder that may make the best bid whereas on the identical time the pre-pack process could be honest, clear and aggressive.
One ought to understand that if allowed, the pre-pack will usually not be primarily within the curiosity of collectors. Even when collectors grudgingly settle for by not actively opposing a pre-pack, this doesn’t in any approach imply that the pre-pack has been carried out within the curiosity of collectors. So long as it’s potential that the associated celebration could make an abusive supply through which the collectors will obtain out of the pre-pack worth (barely) above liquidation worth, this isn’t within the pursuits of collectors: it’s within the curiosity of the associated celebration.
Additionally it is not clear how the Proposal ought to be positioned in relation to EU Preventive Restructuring Directive adopted in 2019.[31] The Pre-pack Proposal undermines the working of the Preventive Restructuring Directive which has a extra balanced strategy. There are important limitations within the Preventive Restructuring Directive in opposition to shareholders retaining worth in case of a restructuring process the place collectors aren’t paid in full.[32] The pre-pack Proposal circumvents this ‘drawback’ for shareholders all collectively, by permitting for the acquisition by the shareholder of the whole enterprise out of pre-pack, with out collectors voting. The brand new preventive restructuring proceedings present for a debtor in possession insolvency continuing which supplies enough time for the debtor to organize and current a plan. Within the legislative total framework, this debtor in possession process may be supplemented with a pre-pack process the place additionally some respiration house is offered in case of a contemplated sale of the enterprise to 3rd events. Within the Pre-pack Proposal, there isn’t any evaluation and no argument offered why associated events ought to be given the chance to amass the enterprise within the closed bidding atmosphere of the pre-pack, whereas they will already make use of preventive debtor in possession procedures. Permitting associated celebration pre-packs solely additional enlarges the pure benefits of such associated events.
The final justification for the whole harmonisation Proposal additionally doesn’t persuade in so far as associated celebration pre-packs are involved. The Preamble states that the measures shall be adopted to additional the free motion of capital in accordance with the precept of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.[33] We, nevertheless, merely don’t see how this case may be made as to forcing Member States to introduce associated celebration pre-packs and leaving open the opportunity of an aggressive strategy and exploiting the three issues we’ve recognized. Though we’re sympathetic to non-related celebration pre-packs, we have already got some issue seeing how permitting for such non associated pre-packs would actually foster the free motion of capital. It’d very properly be the opposite approach round, that cross border lenders develop into reluctant to lend cross border in the event that they know events in international jurisdiction can merely proceed the enterprise whereas leaving collectors unpaid. This shall be rather more the case, if associated events can proceed the enterprise after buying it out of a controllable pre-pack.
We consider that Member States ought to retain the liberty to easily ban associated celebration pre-pack acquisitions. The Proposal could be rather more consistent with current guidelines within the totally different Member States, if it will permit for this freedom and would then set minimal safety to be utilized if Member States would go for associated celebration pre-packs. The start of the availability would then present (recommended change given in capitals):
Article 32 Events intently associated to the debtor within the sale course of
Member States MAY ALLOW that events intently associated to the debtor are eligible to amass the debtor’s enterprise or half thereof, offered that all the following situations are met: (…)
Moreover, the checks and stability contained in article 32 Proposal in case of associated celebration pre-packs ought to be necessary and never elective. That is additionally consistent with the Modification proposed by the European Parliament in July 2025.[34]
4.2 Proposed pre-packs with associated events: actually unhealthy for workers
Particularly problematic underneath the Proposal is the place of worker rights.
Beneath the Switch of Undertakings and Enterprise Directive staff routinely switch to the acquirer within the occasion of a enterprise switch.[35] Member States might, nevertheless, make use of the so known as ‘insolvency exception’, permitting Member States to supply that staff don’t switch in case an enterprise is bought out of an insolvency continuing. Some Member States, such because the Netherlands, have opted for this exception. Others, together with Germany, haven’t. Nonetheless, even when a Member State has opted out, staff nonetheless do switch when the insolvency continuing will not be genuinely ‘aimed toward liquidation’. We perceive the case regulation of the European Courtroom of Justice (CJEU Estro-case and CJEU-Heiploeg case[36]) to imply that in case of a sale to a associated celebration, staff do switch.[37] This additionally makes good sense, since in any other case, transfers to associated events can simply be orchestrated whereas eliminating staff.[38]
An necessary new function of the envisioned European pre-pack is to take away this safety at a European stage and easily present at a European stage that each one pre-packs are aimed toward liquidation. See article 20/2 Proposal Harmonisation Directive.[39] It will merely imply that staff can at all times be fired in case of pre-packs,[40] additionally if carried out with associated events.[41] Thereby, an necessary facet of harmonised European Insolvency Regulation shall be abolished. Europe will subsequently be harmonising and strengthening the place of shareholders on the expense of staff.
Apparently the European Parliament additionally already believes the present fee Proposal goes too far. The European Parliament has put forth an modification (in daring)
For the needs of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC40, the liquidation section shall be thought of to be chapter or insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor underneath the supervision of a reliable public authority, offered that the liquidation of the debtor’s enterprise as a going concern satisfies to the best extent potential the claims of the collectors.[42]
From the wordings themselves, it’s nevertheless not clear how this provision ought to be understood and utilized. One may learn it as an try and codify the case regulation by the Courtroom of Justice of the European Union in CJEU Estro and Heiploeg. The addition is an nearly literal quote from the CJEU Heiploeg case.[43] We might help such an interpretation. The complete article, nevertheless, then turns into slightly sophisticated. The Proposal by the Fee clearly needs to reverse the case regulation by the CJEU but the modification by the European Parliament appears to need to codify it.
The higher strategy could be to acknowledge that pre-packs are certainly aimed toward liquidation of the enterprise, until the pre-pack is carried out with a associated celebration. The textual content of artwork. 20/2 Proposal would develop into (recommended addition once more in capitals to the present Proposal):
For the needs of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC16, when it takes place in proceedings which might finish within the liquidation of the debtor, the liquidation section shall be thought of to be chapter proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor underneath the supervision of a reliable public authority, UNLESS THE PRE-PACK IS CONDUCTED WITH A PARTY CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DEBTOR.[44]
We propose that, no matter whether or not the pre-pack with associated events certainly turns into elective as an alternative of necessary as we’ve recommended above, a associated celebration pre-pack can by no means be thought of to be aimed toward liquidation of the enterprise. That approach we don’t put shareholders’ pursuits in insolvency above staff’ pursuits. On the identical time, the Proposal ought to make sure that pre-packs with outdoors events develop into extra enticing than pre-packs with associated events. This could create a extra stage enjoying area. The right process for associated events to observe would then not be the pre-pack process, however could be to make use of the brand new preventive insolvency procedures with involvement of collectors and submitting a plan to collectors’ vote.
4.3 Course of itself: unhealthy for democracy
It isn’t clear what the background of the present proposal on pre-packs with associated events has been. The pre-pack proposal is thereby each in content material and in its genesis, very totally different from the opposite most important matter for harmonization, being transaction avoidance.[45] The proposal for transaction avoidance has been the product of intensive comparative regulation analyses and a number of other experiences.[46] Very probably due to this extra deliberate strategy, the proposal for transaction avoidance is an efficient match with the prevailing authorized guidelines in numerous Member States and supplies for a good stage of safety of collectors. Because the Proposal presently stands, this sadly can’t be stated from the pre-pack proposal. There isn’t a identifiable revealed underlying comparative authorized evaluation, nor does the present Proposal match with the prevailing authorized regimes. It doesn’t present a good stage of safety of collectors, nor for workers.
Pre-packs have, as stated, a tainted repute. Within the Netherlands, this has led to heated debates as whether or not to formally implement new guidelines and how one can take care of staff’ rights thereunder. After the Dutch labour union FNV has litigated its case all the best way as much as the CJEU, there’s now a legislative proposal within the Netherlands to have all staff switch together with the enterprise.[47] The Proposal now appears to need to bypass nationwide resistance to associated celebration pre-packs by introducing one thing which is opposed at nationwide ranges by way of a European Directive.
5. Conclusion and 16 phrases of suggestions
The EU is dashing to introduce a pre-pack for associated events. The Proposal is a powerful departure from what any of the Member States presently has in place. There isn’t a floor and never even an evaluation why Member States ought to introduce pre-packs with associated events. Pre-packs with associated events are usually not carried out for the sake of the collectors, however shall be primarily carried out for the sake of the associated events. If the EU needs to discover this selection, it ought to at most be an possibility for Member States. This recommended change within the Proposal, from its present model of forcing Member States to our recommended model of permitting Member States would offer for a distinct European insolvency regulation all collectively.[48] On the identical time it may be achieved very simply by offering the next (recommended change given in capitals).
Article 32 Events intently associated to the debtor within the sale course of
Member States MAY ALLOW that events intently associated to the debtor are eligible to amass the debtor’s enterprise or half thereof, offered that all the following situations are met: (…)
Moreover, the safeguards offered in artwork. 32 Proposal ought to be made compulsory by altering “might” in “SHALL” in artwork. 32.1.d and 32. 2.
As to the place of staff, these presently derive safety in case of pre-packs from the Switch of Undertakings and Enterprise Directive, most notably if the acquiror is a associated celebration. The Proposal seeks to abolish this safety and reverse the road of instances rendered by the Courtroom of Justice of the European Union in CJEU Estro and CJEU Heiploeg. Hereby, pre-packs with associated events will most certainly develop into a instrument to do away with private.
The Proposal as to the place of staff in artwork. 20/2 ought to develop into (recommended addition once more in capitals to the present Proposal):
For the needs of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC16, when it takes place in proceedings which might finish within the liquidation of the debtor, the liquidation section shall be thought of to be chapter proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor underneath the supervision of a reliable public authority, UNLESS THE PRE-PACK IS CONDUCTED WITH A PARTY CLOSELY RELATED TO THE DEBTOR.
Rolef de Weijs and Flip Schreurs
R.J. de Weijs is professor of Insolvency Regulation on the College of Amsterdam and legal professional at Houthoff Amsterdam. Ph. W. Schreurs is associate at Boels & Zanders, PhD researcher at Radboud College Nijmegen and former chair of Insolad Netherlands. This contribution builds on earlier work of each authors, most notably Ph. W. Schreurs, ‘Terugblikken op en vooruitkijken naar de gelieerde doorstart’, Insolventie in Context, Liber Amicorum Vriesendorp, 2025 and R.J. de Weijs and J.P.H. Zwemmer, European harmonisation of Pre-packs: Initiating a European race to the underside on the expense of staff – Company Finance Lab.
[1] We base our evaluation on the Proposal for a Directive harmonising sure points of insolvency regulation, 23 Could 2025, 2022/0408 (COD), (https://information.consilium.europa.eu/doc/doc/ST-9257-2025-INIT/en/pdf) (hereafter ‘The Proposal’). Amendments have been proposed by the European Parliament on 1 July 2025 (A10-0126/2025). Different matters within the Proposal embrace transaction avoidance, asset tracing, administrators’ obligation to file and guidelines on creditor committees.
[2] See 2025-04-doc1 The European pre-pack is slowly being unpacked – Prof. Dr. Bob Wessels and https://transactions.freshfields.com/put up/102kswv/eu-insolvency-law-momentum-builds-as-european-parliament-comments-on-the-draft-d.
[3] The trustee usually can also be concerned within the confidential pre-pack interval. The Proposal refers to this function within the preparation section as ‘monitor’.
[4] See the chief abstract of the Graham Report, with the opening query: “So why have pre-packs managed to assemble such a nasty identify?” See additionally the attractive title, which even places the unhealthy earlier than the nice: ‘No Evil is With out Good’: A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-pack Gross sales within the UK and the Netherlands, Int. Insolv. Rev. (2018), by A. Kastrinou and S. Vullings. See additionally G. Gispen, ‘The Pre-Pack is flawed and no good for the joint collectors’ (unique, ‘De ‘pre-pack’ is ondeugdelijk en niet goed voor de gezamenlijke schuldeisers’, in XL 40 Mr. Mart (M.J.M.) Franken, p. 84), and F. De Leo, [Pre-packs, transl.]: it isn’t all roses, you know, https://corporatefinancelab.org/2017/05/02/het-stil-faillissement-it-is-not-all-roses-you-know/.
[5] See Preamble 22 and artwork. 24 Proposal.
[6] See additionally G. Gispen, ‘De ‘pre-pack’ is ondeugdelijk en niet goed voor de gezamenlijke schuldeisers’, in XL 40 Mr. Mart (M.J.M.) Franken, p. 84. And see additionally Van Andel (translated), “A chapter process will not be one thing which simply occurs to a celebration. Usually chapter is a deliberate selection: are we going to pay for a restructuring of the collectors and the staff, or ought to we put the corporate into chapter 11 and purchase the enterprise and proceed in a brand new authorized entity?” W.J. van Andel, ‘Cease de pre-pack’, TvI 2014/37.
[7] See additionally nr. 22 Preamble to Proposal.
[8] See first public report Estro, 5 July 2014.Within the Estro case, the previous shareholder not directly sought to amass the corporate for an quantity round € 4 million, an quantity simply above the liquidation worth if the property could be bought out of a standard non pre-packaged insolvency continuing. Solely after tense discussions with the envisioned trustee, the circle of potential bidders was enlarged and the supply, nonetheless by a associated celebration, was elevated to a worth above € 10 million.
[9] Pre-packs develop into particularly problematic in case a Member State permits for shareholders loans with safety rights. The shareholder can then embark on a credit score bid technique. A credit score bid outdoors associated events signifies that a secured creditor could make a bid with its declare as an alternative of money. Credit bid basically have as their darkish facet that they will scare away different events, which is known as the ‘chilling impact’ of credit score bids. In case of associated events, the issue is once more exacerbated and turns into totally different in nature. Right here the shareholder has organized for itself a place the place it could bid as much as an quantity of its declare and guarantee continued use of and say over property however insolvency of the corporate. See for an instance of aggressive credit score bidding by a shareholder, the Dutch case McGregor. See mixed Public Report McGregor Group, 1 September 2016, out there by way of https://cms.regulation/nl/NLD/Publication/Bankruptcies/McGregor-Group. See for an in depth evaluation (in Dutch) A.L. Jonkers, ‘McGregor, de houdgreep van de aandeelhouders en de rechtvaardiging van beperkte aansprakelijkheid’, TvI 2017/15.
[10] In 2016, the ‘Report Examine on a brand new strategy to enterprise failure and insolvency’ (by G. McCormack a.o.) nonetheless offered the next: “In Europe, the follow of pre-packs has been largely confined to the UK, France, the Netherlands and, to a sure extent, Greece, Eire and Slovenia.”
[11] See extra elaborate in Dutch, Ph. W. Schreurs, ‘Terugblikken op en vooruitkijken naar de gelieerde doorstart’, Insolventie in Context, Liber Amicorum Vriesendorp, 2025, primarily based upon an examination of the principles in a number of European nations and the EU, which examination was closed in Could 2024. Components of this paragraph are derived from this extra intensive evaluation.
[12] Artwork. 642[-3] Code du Commerce supplies in unique: Ni le débiteur, (…), ni les dirigeants de droit ou de fait de la personne morale en liquidation judiciaire, (…) ni les personnes ayant ou ayant eu la qualité de contrôleur au cours de la procédure ne sont admis, directement ou par personne interposée, à présenter une offre. De même, il est fait interdiction à ces personnes d’acquérir, dans les cinq années suivant la cession (…) Translation: Neither the debtor, (…), nor the authorized or de facto administrators of the authorized entity in liquidation, (…) nor the individuals having or having had the standing of controller through the process are admitted, instantly or via an middleman, to submit a proposal. Equally, these individuals are prohibited from buying, inside 5 years following the switch (…)
There are some exceptions for agricultural firms.
[13] Artwork. 224 lid 1 Ley Concursal states that money owed in a standard asset sale won’t switch to the purchaser. In case of a sale with a associated celebration nevertheless,artwork. 224 lid 2 jo 283 Ley Concursal states: No será de aplicación lo dispuesto en el apartado anterior cuando los adquirentes de las unidades productivas sean personas especialmente relacionadas con el concursado. Translation: The provisions of the earlier part shall not apply when the purchasers of the productive items are individuals who’re particularly associated to the bankrupt debtor.
[14] Artwork. 283 Ley Concursal.
[15] See artwork. 162 InsO: Die Veräußerung des Unternehmens oder eines Betriebs ist nur mit Zustimmung der Gläubigerversammlung zulässig, wenn der Erwerber oder eine Individual, die an seinem Kapital zu mindestens einem Fünftel beteiligt ist, (…) zu den Personen gehört, die dem Schuldner nahestehen (§ 138). Translation: The sale of an organization or a enterprise is just permitted with the consent of the collectors’ assembly if the purchaser or an individual who holds no less than one-fifth of its capital (…) is without doubt one of the individuals intently related to the debtor (Part 138).
[16] De ‘Przygotowana likwidacja’ (ready liquidation) has been launched in january 2016 in artwork. 56a-f of the Polish Insolvencycode.
[17] See W. Kapica & D. Radwański, ‘Insolvency prepack transactions in Poland’, 2021.
[18] See J. Vananroye, A. van Hoe and G. Lindemans, Curb Your Opportunism: Limits to Group Constructions and Asset Partitioning in Insolvency in Belgium, NACIIL Annual Report 2018, out there at https://nvrii.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/preadviezen-2018.pdf. In an effort to counterbalance strategic benefit of insiders, Article XX.87, § 2 comprises the next rule: Ingeval een offerte uitgaat van personen die controle op de onderneming uitoefenen of hebben uitgeoefend gedurende zes maanden voorafgaand aan de opening van de process, en die rechtstreeks of onrechtstreeks de controle hebben over rechten die noodzakelijk zijn voor de voortzetting van haar activiteiten, kan die offerte slechts in aanmerking worden genomen op voorwaarde dat die rechten onder dezelfde voorwaarden toegankelijk zijn voor de andere bieders. Translation: In case a bid is made by individuals who management the enterprise (or managed it throughout six months previous to the initiation of the judicial reorganization) and who both instantly or not directly management any rights that are essential to proceed the actions, the supply can solely be taken into consideration if such rights are made accessible to different bidders underneath the identical phrases and situations. (translation taken from J. Vananroye, A. van Hoe and G. Lindemans).
[19] Loi du 7 août 2023 relative à la préservation des entreprises et portant modernisation du droit de la faillite , artwork. 58, 2: “Au cas où une offre émane de personnes qui exercent ou ont exercé le contrôle de l’entreprise et exercent en même temps directement ou indirectement, le contrôle sur des droits nécessaires à la poursuite de ses activités, cette offre ne peut être prise en considération qu’à la situation que ces droits soient accessibles dans les mêmes situations aux autres offrants.” Translation: Regulation of seven August 2023 on the preservation of companies and modernising chapter regulation, artwork. 58, 2: “Within the occasion that a proposal comes from individuals who train or have exercised management of the enterprise and on the identical time train, instantly or not directly, management over rights mandatory for the continuation of its actions, this supply might solely be considered on the situation that these rights are accessible underneath the identical situations to different offerors. See Th. Mastrullo, Transposing the Directive (EU) 2019/1023: The brand new Luxembourg preventive restructuring regulation, European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal 2024/4.
[20] See for the Netherlands J.R. Hurenkamp, ‘Failliet of quick ahead? Een analyse van de pre-pack in de praktijk’, TvI 2015/20. Within the Nederlands within the interval 2012-2014 in 15 out of 39 pre-packs, the sale was to a associated celebration.
[21] This was the case in England. See T. Graham, Graham Evaluate into Pre-pack Administration June 2014, web page 37.
[22] In fact there are numerous extra guidelines and the Proposal itself ought to be consulted to get a full understanding of the envisioned working and interaction of the totally different guidelines.
[23] In fact there’s the essential governance rule that the switch of an enterprise is ready with the help of an impartial monitor underneath the supervision of the courtroom (artwork. 22 Proposal) and that Member States shall make sure that the sale course of is aggressive, clear, honest, and meets market requirements (artwork. 22a Proposal).
[24] In Preamble 25 the Proposal suggests implementing so known as stalking horse provisions. The stalking horse process, nevertheless, solely supplies a treatment to issues associated to the closed bidding atmosphere. It ought to be acknowledged that in case of associated celebration pre-packs, there ought to be further safeguards additionally due to the benefit a associated celebration has as to inside data. Subsequently, a greater rule could be to supply for an identical precept in case of associated celebration transactions. Beneath an identical precept, a associated celebration would make a binding supply and exterior events ought to be allowed to amass the corporate for that bid throughout a sure time period. Solely this manner there may be some consolation that the associated celebration would truly be paying for the enterprise what it’s price.
[25] See additionally Preamble nr. 24a with some room to that extent: “The place it turns into evident in the middle of the preparation section that the targets of the pre-pack can’t be achieved, Member States ought to be capable of permit for the termination of the pre-prack proceedings. Such conditions can happen the place the debtor fails to cooperate with the monitor or to conduct the preparation section with due diligence, or the place there isn’t any affordable prospect of promoting the enterprise as a going concern. The latter could possibly be the case, for instance, the place the books and information of the debtor are incomplete or poor to a level that makes it not possible to establish its enterprise and monetary scenario.”
[26] See M.H.F. van Vught, ‘De Nederlandse pre-pack: timeout, please!’, FIP 2014/47. In unique: “Dat de concurrente crediteuren, zoals de MvT stelt, na faillissement ex artwork. 69 Fw de rechter-commissaris kunnen vragen de curator te bevelen de pre-pack niet uit voeren, is theoretisch gezien juist, maar de facto zinledig. De pre-pack heeft immers tot doel zo snel mogelijk na faillissement de doorstart te bewerkstelligen en zal op de dag van faillietverklaring worden geëffectueerd. Het faillissement is dan nog niet eens gepubliceerd, kennisgeving aan de bekende crediteuren nog niet verzonden. Het verzoek ex artwork. 69 komt daardoor als mosterd na de maaltijd. Het is maar de vraag of potentiële voordeel voor de concurrente crediteuren voor hen opweegt tegen het feitelijke verlies van hun positie in het na de pre-pack volgend faillissement.”
[27] See beforehand for the Dutch nationwide setting, Ph. W. Schreurs, ‘Terugblikken op en vooruitkijken naar de gelieerde doorstart’, Insolventie in Context, Liber Amicorum Vriesendorp, 2025. See additionally Van Andel, ‘Cease de Pre-pack’, TvI 2014/37. Translation: “Subsequently, in my opinion a pre-pack shouldn’t be allowed in these instances the place it’s the entrepreneur himself or a intently associated celebration that seeks to proceed the enterprise, as was the case in Estro.”
[28] Beforehand, certainly one of us, has already overtly questioned whether or not it’s humanly potential for a associated celebration to adjust to its data and cooperation obligations in direction of the monitor or envisioned trustee, if such celebration needs to amass the enterprise itself. See Ph.W. Schreurs,’De gelieerde doorstart na het Heiploeg-arrest’, TvI 2020/28.
[29] See artwork. 33a-2 Proposal. “Member States shall make sure that, the place safety pursuits encumber the enterprise topic to the pre-pack mechanism, collectors who’re the beneficiaries of these safety pursuits might offset their claims in opposition to the acquisition worth solely to an quantity not exceeding the market worth of the enterprise.” Extra as a facet be aware, we wish to comment that we fail to spot how this rule suggesting a limitation as to the scope of credit score bidding can ever be related.
[30] The one argument supplied in favour of associated celebration pre-packs is to be present in Preamble nr. 28: “The most effective supply shouldn’t be disqualified from the preparation section solely on the premise that it comes from a intently associated celebration to a debtor.”
[31] See Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of 20 June 2019 on Preventive Restructuring Frameworks.
[32] See most notably artwork 11 Preventive Restructuring on the necessary inclusion of a precedence rule in case of cross-class cram-downs.
[33] Preamble Proposal, nr. 60: “For the reason that targets of this Directive can’t be sufficiently achieved by the Member States as a result of variations between nationwide insolvency frameworks would proceed to lift obstacles to the free motion of capital and the liberty of multinational, however can slightly be higher achieved at Union stage, the Union might undertake measures, in accordance with the precept of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the precept of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive doesn’t transcend what is critical with the intention to obtain these targets.”
[34] See Modification European Parliament, 1 July 2025 (A10-0126/2025) as to article 32 Proposal: “Member States shall present that the place it’s proved that the disclosure obligation referred to within the first subparagraph, level (a), was breached, the courtroom revokes the advantages referred to in Article 28.”
[35] See Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on Staff’ Rights within the Occasion of Transfers of Undertakings, Companies or components of Undertakings or Companies.
[36] See CJEU, 22 June 2017, Case C-126/16 (Estro/Smallsteps) and CJEU, 28 April 2022, Case C-237/20 (Heiploeg), nr. 26. Within the Smallsteps process the pre-pack was carried out with a associated celebration and was not aimed toward liquidation. In Heiploeg the pre-pack was carried out with solely outdoors events and was aimed toward liquidation. See for the evaluation in full R.J. de Weijs and J.P.H. Zwemmer, https://corporatefinancelab.org/2025/09/02/european-harmonisation-of-pre-packs-initiating-a-european-race-to-the-bottom-at-the-expense-of-employees/.
[37] See extra elaborate on the significance of the identification of the acquiror in relation to the applying of the Switch of Undertakings and Enterprise Directive Ph.W. Schreurs, ‘De gelieerde doorstart na het Heiploeg-arrest’, TvI 2020/28, Ph. W. Schreurs, ‘Terugblikken op en vooruitkijken naar de gelieerde doorstart’, Insolventie in Context, Liber Amicorum Vriesendorp, 2025.
[38] The excellence between pre-packs with associated events and non-related events additionally matches with a extra common understanding of what an enterprise truly is. Beneath Dutch Company Revenue Tax, an enterprise is considered as ‘a long-lasting organisational union of capital and labor’. If the previous capital supplier is now not concerned after going via insolvency, it also needs to be potential to let go of extra staff in that course of. Nonetheless, if previous capital (shareholder) stays, so ought to staff.
[39] Article 20/2 Proposal now supplies that ‘the liquidation section shall be thought of to be chapter proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings instituted with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor’.
[40] The Proposal doesn’t search to change the Switch of Undertakings and Enterprise Directive itself. Subsequently, Member States can proceed to supply that additionally in case of a switch of a enterprise out of insolvency, staff do switch together with the enterprise as is presently the case in Germany. Though the Proposal forces Member States to permit for associated celebration pre-packs and likewise seeks to reverse the CJEU case regulation in Estro and Heiploeg, it stays potential for Member States to not enact the insolvency exception.
[41] In Preamble 28e of the Proposal, Member States are given the choice to introduce further necessities obliging related-party acquirers to keep up current employment contracts. Beneath the envisaged EU regulation, dismissals would subsequently be allowed, until Member States determine to supply further safety themselves. The European pre-pack would subsequently dismantle long-established safety on the European stage and relegate the problem to Member States.
[42] See Modification European Parliament, 1 July 2025 (A10-0126/2025) as to article 20/2 Proposal.
[43] See CJEU, 28 April 2022, Case C-237/20 (Heiploeg), nr: 67 (emphasis added by authors): “Article 5(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the legal guidelines of the Member States regarding the safeguarding of staff’ rights within the occasion of transfers of undertakings, companies or components of undertakings or companies have to be interpreted as which means that the situation which it lays down, in accordance with which Articles 3 and 4 of that directive are to not apply to the switch of an enterprise the place the transferor is the topic of chapter proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings ‘instituted with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor’, is happy the place the switch of all or a part of an enterprise is ready, previous to the establishment of insolvency proceedings with a view to the liquidation of the property of the transferor and in the middle of which that switch is carried out, within the context of a pre-pack process which has as its main purpose to allow, within the insolvency proceedings, a liquidation of the enterprise as a going concern which satisfies to the best extent potential the claims of all of the collectors and preserves employment so far as potential, offered that that pre-pack process is ruled by statutory or regulatory provisions.”
[44] See equivalent R.J. de Weijs and J.P.H. Zwemmer, Modification Defending Staff in opposition to Shareholders, October 2025. The Modification Defending Staff in opposition to Shareholders is included right here in a extra encompassing strategy of defending stakeholders in opposition to abuse and opportunistic use of pre-packs by associated events.
[45] See artwork. 4-12 Proposal.
[46] See R. Bork and P.M. Veder, Harmonisation of Transactions Avoidance Legal guidelines, Larcier Intersentia, 2022. The guide rightfully claims to be the results of an intensive analysis mission that digs deep into the matter of transaction avoidance, comprising nationwide experiences and enter from 25 jurisdictions and analysing the related matters from a principle-based perspective.
[47] The so known as WOVOF II draft was made public for session on Could 27, 2024. The WOVOF can conceptually be positioned as diametrically against the EU Proposal. The WOVOF has as its fundamental rule in a brand new artwork. 7:666b Civil Code that essentially all staff switch with the enterprise in case of a pre-pack. The European Proposal however supplies that there’ll by no means be any worker essentially transferring. We disagree with each approaches and consider that staff ought to essentially switch in case of associated celebration pre-packs however not outdoors thereof.
[48] We don’t agree with the passionate plea by A. Thery to supply for associated celebration pre-pracks. See A. Thery, ‘The pre-pack regulation within the EU Fee proposal for a second insolvency directive’, European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal (out there by way of https://eirjournal.com/article/view/18096/20135). We, nevertheless, do agree with him that artwork. 32 Proposal is a very powerful article in the whole Proposal (Thery, loc. cit, nr 69), the content material of which we expect shall be decisive for the form and dealing of European Insolvency Regulation.
